For FOQ1
Re post in Agriculture...
This is going to become a category well worth reading.
Your ID stands out in a sea of Red. If we ever get any readers they will jump on ** any ** post that is not red!
you said:
Have to be a little bit pedantic here. The thing that caused the shift was not Capitalism, it was the Industrial Revolution. Capitalism started to become a major force shortly thereafter and accelerated the process but it was broad application of machinery that drove our capacity to harvest more crops with fewer people. An additional acceleration came with the development of modern chemistry and subsequently 'soil science.' We may see an additional improvement in calories per acre with the burgeoning Permaculture movement.
What I'm hoping we can do is to "publish" something worth people's time.
In this context, you are an "author" and you have published an enticing opening line of a series.
I wonder about the distinction you've made, and would ** really ** appreciate more details to go with the grand summary.
The concept of Private Property fits into the sequence somewhere, but I'm not sure where. Machinery has been invented all along, with the lever and the wheel just being a couple of examples, along with the boat for flotation. What I suspect we might find is that a combination of factors worked together to liberate the masses from hard labor tending fields.
in any case, in a well designed colony on Mars, we should see almost NO one working with their hands to tend plants, as a ** vocation **. Tending plants by hand will surely be a psychological boost to everyone.
If the colony falls to the point that humans are physically tending plants as a *** vocation *** then something is seriously wrong!
I think your enthusiasm caused you to greatly exaggerate the number of humans needed to tend plants.
However, my interest in promoting this forum is NOT to encourage argument. I think that one or two members in the old forum got a psychological benefit out of argument, and quite possibly, by feeling superior to others. I can't prove that, of course. It just ** seemed ** that way to me. My concern is that a defeated member is a member on the way out the door.
I am hoping we might create a climate in which a "first draft" idea might be given freedom to run for a while, but that the author would be willing to consider feedback that arrives as folks consider it.
If an idea is *** really *** solid, it might eventually become dogma.
An example is the 3-5-8 rule for atmosphere in habitats ...
The old forum has (literally) years of discussion of this important rule for habitats and for space craft.
Upon occasion, decimal points went out to several places.
By now, I ** hope ** it has settled down to dogma, with a simple, easy-to-remember formula that children can learn.
As the lead author in the Agriculture category, please continue developing a series that a person (let's imagine a young person) could read and find enlightenment that stands up to further reading.
If you ever change your mind, you can always go back to revise the title, but for now, let's see if you can support your premise.
(th)